Foster Adoption Blog

07/11/07

Lawsuit in Rhode Island

Posted by : Kelly in Foster Adoption Blog at 06:02 pm , 556 words, 159 views  
Categories: Issues in Foster-Adopt Care, In the News!
justice system

There is an interesting report coming out of Rhode Island. There is a federal lawsuit against the Rhode Island Department of Children, claiming that they have the highest rates of abuse and neglect against foster children in the United States. The lawsuit is filed on behalf of 3,000 different children. That right there says a lot.

We all know that the social services departments across the country need some serious reform. This article highlights some of the areas that need the biggest changes. Here are some of the complaints listed:

Overloaded caseworkers who go months at a time without visiting the children. You bet caseworkers are overloaded, and that means the kids and the foster parents suffer. Services are not being given to the families who need them most. It takes days, or longer, to get a phone call returned.


SPONSOR
The report claims that 69% of the child placing agencies in Rhode Island were unlicensed. WHAT?!?! I thought we already had huge lawsuits and this was brought to the public’s attention when we were looking at the possible nullification on many Russian adoptions. Why is this going on in our own country?

In the years between 2000 and 2005, Rhode Island had the highest rate of abuse and neglect in foster children in the country. This goes hand in hand with overworked caseworkers. Caseworkers not getting foster parents the services that they need and not visiting the kids equals stressed foster parents who may end up abusing a child.

One of the things I have heard said about abuse in foster care is that we take kids out of abusive homes, and we’re supposed to be protecting them. Instead they wind up placed in a home just as bad, and sometimes worse, than the home they were removed from.

That is not true of all foster parents, but it is the ones that do abuse kids and make the headlines that give foster care a bad name.

The story of young boy who is called “David” is detailed in a Providence Journal article. He was removed from his birth home at the age of two and placed in a foster home. He was there for two years before being sent to live with an aunt in Michigan who was unable to keep him. Upon his return, he wanted to return to the foster mom’s house, but he wasn’t allowed to. At the age of six he was placed in a psychiatric hospital for five months, where he was sexually abused by a roommate, and the story keeps getting worse.

The Providence Journal article also brings up the rates of care for foster parents. I did some calculations. If foster parents were paid minimum wage for “working” a 40 hour week, the minimum monthly payment would be $936. The highest foster care rate in Rhode Island is $474 per month or $15.79 per day, and we all know that foster parents work more than 40 hours a week. Figuring a 40 hour week, that works out to $2.96 per hour. How is it that foster parents are in this for the money?

I wonder if more states will have similar lawsuits coming? It sure would be a blow to the foster care system, but might make some legislators sit up and take notice. What are your thoughts?

Boston.com article

Providence Journal

Photo credit

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: lmg1567 [Member] Email
Wow, 15.79/day? I think that's about $1.20/day more than MI gets and it's just pitiful. Would you ever let a boarder rent a room in your home for that low of an amount? Oh, and don't forget - you'd be cleaning up after this person, doing their laundry, bathing them, taking them to 10 appts. per month, dealing with their emotional outbursts. I know that all of the people I know who have ever or still do foster care do not do it for the money (myself included). I think the issue of money comes in when 1) you're being accused of being greedy and doing it for the moola or 2) when you're picking up dinner for the 3rd time in a week because it's 7pm and you've been racing around since 6 am dealing with kids, school, appts., counseling, etc. and you realize that if you didn't have all of these crises going on all day, you'd have time to make dinner. There's a cost for everything. Don't even get me started on damage to our homes, we had to sign a waiver absolving FIA of all responsibility for damage done to our home when we renewed our license (hmmmm, wonder why that was?).

Kids should not be abused in foster homes, no matter how much their getting paid, that's a non-issue. I had a child who was wonderful, lived with us 2 years and his worker showed up every 4-6 months to visit. The kicker was, by not being a difficult kid, she thought she didn't have to visit. The downside of that was she didn't see the bond he had with us, the way he interacted with my kids and it was easier for her to keep giving the bio-family "one more chance". Well he went back to live with his dad (whom he had NEVER previously lived with) and within the first six weeks of placement, they moved three times. We've not seen him in 6 years now and have heard that he has been back in foster care twice since then - never with us, because we had the audacity to question the worker about the dad's competence. She sure showed us.....
PermalinkPermalink 07/12/07 @ 12:14
Comment from: Kelly [Member] Email · http://fost-adopt.adoptionblogs.com
You hit on one of my pet peeves in "the system". A child is removed from a home where he/she is happy, well bonded, and loved and when the next placement doesn't work out, don't return that child to a home that you know you suitable, move them from home to home to home trying to find the right fit.

UGH! Isn't the slogan "The best interest of the child"? I'm not seeing it.
PermalinkPermalink 07/12/07 @ 17:06
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Misc

Subscribe to Foster Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 132