Foster Adoption Blog

11/14/06

Birth Order and a Quiz!

Posted by : Michelle Vandepas in Foster Adoption Blog at 03:42 pm , 422 words, 465 views  
Categories: Web sites
tickletest photo

I've been thinking a lot about birth order as we start the adoption process again. K was the first born by her birth mom, and first child for my hubby and myself, and so she is the eldest, first child in every possible sense.

I haven't wanted to mess up that up by adopted 'out of birth order', although our agency says that the best way to add to a family is to add to the middle of the children.

In other words, if we had an eight year old and a three year old, we'd adopt a five year old. The agency says that children already in the family do better if they don't get displaced as oldest or youngest, a middle child can just change the middle status a bit...

Make sense?

The trainer has about ten years experience watching and counseling adoptive families, so I believe him.

After we adopt number two, I'll worry about adding number three in the middle.

Oh heavens! Did I really say that? Number three????

3?


---------

I'm the oldest of three girls, and it showed in the
Birth Order Quiz



Eldest children are generally the focus of their parents' attention until younger siblings are introduced into the family. While this early attachment with adults fosters a positive self-image, eldest children tend to be concerned that they will lose their caregivers' love and attention if younger siblings join the family. Thus, eldest children tend to be sensitive about receiving enough attention, and can also be very competitive in a variety of areas.

The flip side of this situation is that when younger siblings arrive, eldest children take on a new role that gives them power and respect. They begin to view themselves as leaders in relation to their younger siblings. To establish authority and protect their role as the eldest sibling, they strive to succeed at everything they do and become even more competitive. Frequently, eldest children grow up enjoying being the center of attention, and can, in certain circumstance, take on a sense of exaggerated self-importance.

Occupations that are generally well suited for only children include politicians, astronauts, college professors or members of other learned groups. This is because eldest children are usually attracted to professions that are powerful and prestigious. Eldest children routinely have a strong desire to be successful.

Famous people who are eldest children are:
Brandy
George W. Bush
Hillary Rodham Clinton
Oprah Winfrey
Katherine Hepburn

SPONSOR


Humm.. Sounds like me!


Birth Order Quiz

Photo credit, tickle tests. http://web.tickle.com/

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Dr. G [Member] Email · http://adoptive-parenting.adoptionblogs.com/
hmm...that's an interesting concept. about maintaining the oldest and youngest child status. we definitely planned to adopt a child younger than our son so that he would remain the oldest. as you know we ended up adopting a sibling pair and both were younger than our son so it all worked out. the baby of the sibling pair remained the baby. my son remained the oldest. and my middle daughter remained the oldest girl. everyone got a chance to retain some of their birth order identity. i guess. i don't know if it mattered that much to the kids though. i think it does now, but only because that's the way my husband and i have framed it for them when talking about it. your daughter is two, right? that means you're looking to adopt an infant?
PermalinkPermalink 11/14/06 @ 15:54
Comment from: Michelle Vandepas [Member] Email · http://fost-adopt.adoptionblogs.com/
Dr. G. Daughter is three.. (!) in two weeks.. I'd take any child under two......As time passes, the age will up.. if it takes us a year, I'll go up to three, I'd like a year between them if possible.

Also, when we had our foster son for a month this summer, he is five and was a TERRIBLE influence on K. I was running ragged trying to pull it together. Given time, I could have, but I'm not sure I WANT to...

PermalinkPermalink 11/14/06 @ 17:11
Comment from: Dr. G [Member] Email · http://adoptive-parenting.adoptionblogs.com/
neato. with as much time as is usually required to get through all of the rigamorole you might end up having a three year old and a five year old. that would be nice. close enough together to move through whole developmental phases at (roughly) the same time. old enough to be quasi-independent or at least starting to get the hang of it. although of course you'll want your newest addition to the family to show some dependency for at least a little bit, just to experience that whole...thing. young enough to enjoy that sweet and adorable phase. neat, i'm excited for you Michelle. good luck with it all.
PermalinkPermalink 11/14/06 @ 18:53
Comment from: Chance [Member] Email
We beleive the same thing. When we first started to foster we said we wanted under 5 years old (we had no children). But now out son will be turning 3 and we have our house open for 3 and under, and we willn ot be adopting child older then him. I beleive it is important to keep the youngest and oldest and go in the middle. but that is just my opinion.
amie_1281@hotmail.com
PermalinkPermalink 11/16/06 @ 11:55
Comment from: Michelle Vandepas [Member] Email · http://older-parent.adoptionblogs.com/
Chance: Good luck in your quest for another child! We are just starting now, - who knows how long it will take!
Thanks for commenting.
PermalinkPermalink 11/16/06 @ 14:27
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Misc

Subscribe to Foster Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • kepow
  • Guest Users: 97